Posts Tagged ‘career’

Roger Clemens Twitter Denial: Statistical Evidence Why He’s Lying

August 20th, 2010

Roger Clemens flatly denied allegations of HGH or steroid use on Twitter yesterday after news was released of his impending indictment for lying to Congress.

"I never took HGH or Steroids. And I did not lie to Congress. I look forward to challenging the Governments accusations, and hope people will keep an open mind until trial. I appreciate all the support I have been getting. I am happy to finally have my day in court," said the Rocket.

Clemens already had his day in court, back in 2008 when he voluntarily participated in a House committee hearing. He denied steroid use then and, despite an FBI investigation that suggests otherwise, Clemens is stubbornly upholding his claim today.

The court documents say he's lying. But what do the numbers say?

Clemens, whether he's being truthful or not, was unquestionably one of the most dominant pitchers in baseball history.

Over the course of 13 seasons with the Boston Red Sox, Clemens went a remarkable 192-111 in 383 starts. His ERA while with Boston was 3.06 and he struck out 2590 batters, at a rate of 8.4 SO/9 IP. 

He won three Cy Young's and an MVP over that period en route to establishing himself as one of baseball's premier pitchers.

In his last season with the Red Sox in 1996 while 33 years old, Clemens' ERA dropped to a still respectable 3.63 and his WHIP rose to 1.33. He went 10-13 and struck out 257 batters in 242.2 innings. While his numbers were still very good, they paled in comparison to the seasons he had in his prime years (1986—1992).

Then in 1997 Clemens signed with the Toronto Blue Jays and had one of the best seasons of his career. He went 21-7 with a 2.05 ERA (career high 222 ERA+) and he struck out a career high 292 batters, while pitching in the same division no less.

Clemens won his fourth Cy Young that year as he lowered his ERA by over a point and a half, and lowered his WHIP by three-tenths of a point from 1.33 to 1.03.

A career year at the age of 34? Seems fishy.

Then Clemens did it all over again.

In 1998 during his second season with Toronto, Clemens went 20-6 with a 2.65 ERA, a 1.10 WHIP, and 271 strikeouts in 234.2 innings. It was good enough for another Cy Young award.

There are some pitchers who get better with age. But after throwing almost 3000 innings while in Boston, it seemed unlikely that Clemens would be able to improve on his craft, let alone maintain it.

Brian McNamee, Clemens' trainer at the time, would be inclined to agree. According to reports, McNamee injected Clemens more than a dozen times with steroids and HGH from 1998—2001.

Indeed, Clemens went on to have several more excellent seasons with the New York Yankees through 2001.

After a somewhat shaky 1999 season, Clemens pitched over 200 innings in 2000 while sporting a 3.70 ERA and helping lead the Yankees to another World Series title.

In 2001 Clemens was brilliant again, at the age of 38. He went 20-3 with a 3.51 ERA and a 1.26 WHIP and struck out almost a batter per inning. He won his sixth Cy Young award.

After that season, the drop off in Clemens' production was noticeable. In his final two seasons with the Yankees Clemens' ERA ballooned to 4.95 (2002) and 3.91 (2003). His strikeout numbers went down and he surrendered an unsightly 42 home runs over those two years.

Clemens retired after 2003 at the age of 40. He un-retired a year later to sign a one-year deal with his hometown Houston Astros and had three more excellent seasons, winning his seventh and final Cy Young in 2004.

However, the difference in leagues is probably the best explanation for the upwards trend in performance in his final years. 

We may never know for sure during what periods Clemens was juicing. But for a pitcher to enjoy career years in his late 30's after over a decade of pitching is not just unprecedented, it's illogical.

Clemens may continue to deny that he used steroids or HGH until he's old and decrepit, but there's one thing we will always know for sure.

The numbers don't lie.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com

Roger Clemens’ Indictment: Did He Lie To Congress?

August 20th, 2010

When Roger Clemens stepped in front of a House committee on Capitol Hill in 2008 and said, “Let me be clear, I have never taken steroids or HGH,” he set himself up for a battle bigger than any he faced during his famed baseball career.

After being mentioned in the Mitchell Report, Clemens voluntarily spoke in front of Tom Davis, the top Republican on the House panel, and Henry Waxman, the committee’s chairman at the time, and potentially dug his own grave.

Davis and Waxman told Clemens before he spoke, “Whatever you do, don’t lie.” Whether there is truth in the subsequent response from Clemens is now anybody’s guess.

It’s a case that is now under investigation, as a federal grand jury indicted Clemens on Thursday for allegedly lying under oath. The jury indicted Clemens on six counts of obstructing a congressional inquiry.

The grand jury believes that Clemens made 15 dishonest statements under oath, including denying that he ever used steroids or human growth hormone.

 

“Self-Inflicted Wound”

The most shocking, or idiotic, part about all of this is that, if Clemens indeed lied to Congress, he did it voluntarily.

Clemens was not under subpoena when he raised his right hand and shunned the Fifth Amendment.

Clemens wanted to go to court in order to clear his name, as if he thought that would wipe his reputation clean.

He wanted to be accepted as a great pitcher, not as a guy who spent 13 seasons with the Boston Red Sox—more than a full career for most pitchers—and then went to the Toronto Blue Jays and mysteriously proceeded to put up the best numbers of his career and win back-to-back Cy Young awards in the process.

Davis and Waxman both believe that Clemens lied to them during his hearing. Given the fact that Clemens could have quietly walked away from it all and into a life without professional baseball, Davis called Clemens’ testimony a “self-inflicted wound.”

It’s a wound that could cut deeper than any positive steroid test ever could. Clemens could face up to 30 years in prison if convicted.

An indictment is far from a conviction, however, and Clemens would never face the max penalty if found guilty. Legal analysts say Clemens would probably face an imprisonment of six to 18 months.

A conclusion will not come for a few years if Barry Bonds’ indictment is any indication of the timetable for these proceedings. A grand jury indicted Bonds in 2007, and his court date isn’t scheduled until March.

But Clemens’ court date means little at this point, as the damage has been done.

He will never be seen as innocent in the eyes of baseball fans, regardless of what a grand jury finds. If nothing conclusive has been found since 2008, why is there any reason to believe that the dirt will come up now?

It’s Clemens’ word versus Brian McNamee’s, his estranged trainer and a former strength and conditioning coach of the New York Yankees, and neither side is going to fold.

McNamee said to a jury during his testimony, among other things, that he injected Clemens with steroids. McNamee gave the grand jury eight-year-old needles that he said he used on Clemens.

McNamee also said that he injected Clemens’ wife with HGH before she appeared in a Sports Illustrated photo shoot.

Clemens has continually denied all claims, and therefore the saga continues. The grand jury will have to wade through the alibis, and the outcome remains uncertain.

 

What about the Hall of Fame?

One outcome that is no longer uncertain is that of Clemens’ Hall of Fame candidacy.

The only players who fans and media members despise more than steroid users are those who lie about being steroid users.

Mark McGwire ended up being a phony on the field, but he chose not to speak about his steroid use under oath, before admitting all of it prior to this season as he prepared to become the hitting coach for the St. Louis Cardinals.

If McGwire can’t obtain the 75 percent of votes required for induction into the Hall of Fame, then there’s no way Clemens will.

Some say Clemens, and other alleged steroid users who haven’t admitted their use, should be inducted if his career merits such an honor. Unfortunately, athletes are not innocent until proven guilty. Perception and reputation are oftentimes far more important than the truth.

“In my opinion he’s a Hall of Famer, period,” Lance Berkman, a former teammate of Clemens, said. “Whatever you want to say about the guy, he belongs in the Hall of Fame. Legacy-wise, I mean 200 years from now, who cares?”

Berkman makes a valid point, but this isn’t about Clemens’ legacy. His legacy has already been trashed, and there’s no going back on that.

Because Clemens approaches all of this with such arrogance, he doesn’t have many, if any, fans in his corner. America has long made up its mind about Roger Clemens, and this investigation won’t change that.

Clemens could be found innocent by the grand jury, and it probably wouldn’t matter. Would anybody believe he never took steroids or HGH, not even once, if nothing came of this investigation? Doubt it.

Clemens can continue to post denials on Twitter and his attorney, Rusty Hardin, can continue to tell people, “how happy Roger is” that he’s finally “getting his day in court.”

Spare us.

Federal investigators need some more time to determine whether or not Clemens lied under oath.

Innocent or guilty, the rest of the country has already reached a conclusion on Clemens.

 

Follow Teddy Mitrosilis on Twitter. You can reach him at tm4000@yahoo.com.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com



What Does the Derrek Lee Addition Mean for the Atlanta Braves?

August 20th, 2010

On Wednesday, the Atlanta Braves completed a four-player deal with the Chicago Cubs to bring first baseman Derrek Lee to Atlanta.

Atlanta gave up three pitchers in the deal to a pitching-deficient club; two were righties, and one was a lefty.

The trade beckoned a question within the minds of the Atlanta faithful: What about Troy Glaus?

Speculation flew that Glaus was done for the season; that this knee issue of his was more serious than first reported; that Glaus, for all he had done for Atlanta, was being thrown under the bus.

Then came what I suspected all along: that the Braves were wanting Glaus to reacquaint himself with third base to give the Braves two solid hitting and fielding corner men.

With all this said, what does the trade for Derrek Lee really mean for this Atlanta Braves team striving to stay atop the National League East division? Let’s analyze, shall we?

 

Derrek Lee brings excellent defense to Atlanta’s infield.

Derrek Lee, a 14-year veteran of the game, has not always been known for Albert Pujols-like power, but he has swung the bat well. He has shown power and average in spurts through his career and is hitting .251 this year with 16 home runs and 56 runs batted in.

My projection is that Lee will finish with about 25 homers and 75 or so runs batted in this year.

He had a career year in 2005, bopping 46 homers, driving in 107 runs, and hitting an astounding .335. The next season, 2006, he injured his wrist and was limited to only 175 at-bats, in which he still was able to muster eight homers, 30 RBI, and a .286 average. He hit well last season, hitting 30 HRs, putting up 111 RBI, and hitting .306.

This season, however, has been a season of issues for all the Cubbies. Yet to make my point, what has never been an issue for Lee was his defense. A three-time Gold Glove Award winner (2003, 2005, 2007), Lee has 89 career errors and boasts a career .994 fielding percentage. Nice, if you ask me.

I compare him to a good-hitting Doug Mientkiewicz, who only had 30 errors his entire 12-year career and holds an impressive .996 career fielding percentage. Only two-thousandths of a percent better than Derrek Lee? Yes.

To make a point about defense, it was defense that won Boston their championship. They had a few select good power hitters, but it was the defense of guys like Mientkiewicz who solidified the championship (and, in fact, made the last out...and then kept the ball and enraged Red Sox Nation).

As the old mantra goes, offense wins games, but defense wins championships. I guess it doesn’t just apply to football, does it?

 

Derrek Lee adds a great clubhouse veteran presence.

Lee has consistently been lauded as a unifying presence, one that held the bits and pieces of a shaken and shattered Cubs clubhouse over the past few years. Honestly, if it hadn’t been for Lee in the Cubs clubhouse, I doubt the Cubs would have gotten as far as they have over the years.

When you have such polarizing clubhouse influences as Carlos Zambrano, Alfonso Soriano, Milton Bradley, and the like, you are going to have choppy waters. Derrek Lee was oftentimes the team lifeguard, pulling good players out of choppy situations. Lee is gone, and the Cubs locker room will suffer. Who are your leaders now? Ryan Dempster? Aramis Ramirez?

Look, for all the Cubs’ good spots, and their bad, Lee was one of the best. I think Jim Hendry realized that the Cubs were the Titanic of the baseball world and that he needed to get the good people off before the ship ran afoul on the iceberg known as reality. Derrek Lee was one, as were Ted Lilly, Mike Fontenot, and Ryan Theriot.

Hendry realizes there is nowhere to go but down from this situation, and he is ready to bring her on down, restock, refuel, and try it again. You will see a new Cubs club next year if the front office actually cares about winning the World Series for the first time since Teddy Roosevelt was in the White House. If not, expect the Cubs to look like the 1980s Braves before it’s all said and done.

 

Derrek Lee Can Hit.

As I mentioned before, D-Lee has had good and great seasons throughout his career. When he’s been healthy, he has hit no fewer than 20 home runs since 2000, when he was with the Marlins. He even won a ring in 2003 with the Marlins and had a Gold Glove to boot.

But the thing is that he can hit, and hit well. He has a career .289 average, 309 career HRs, and is five RBI short of 1,000 for his career. Projecting that he finishes 2010 with 25 homers and 75 RBI, that would put his career numbers at 318 HR and 1,114 RBI. That would mean he averages 22 HR a year and 80 RBI a year.

If he finishes with an average of .275 on the year, meaning he would have to get 55 hits in 164 more at-bats (figuring around 582 more AB on the season with 41 games remaining and four AB per game), or pretty much go 1-for-4 every game, it would put his average at .283 per year.

An average of .283, 22 HR, and 80 RBI per year are decent numbers. Those numbers plus a fielding percentage of .994 means one heck of a first baseman, provided he stays healthy. He is 34, so he should have another three years or so left in the tank. 

 

Derrek Lee isn’t a money-hungry player.

Derrek Lee is at the end of a five-year, $65 million contract. He made $13 million a year for those five years and probably knows that he won’t be making that much when he hits the free agent market. The Braves are looking at dumping about $20 million next year from their books, which is plenty of money to re-sign Derrek Lee.

My thought is that Lee will probably get anywhere from $8-10 million a year on his next contract, and given that he is 34, it will probably be a three to four-year deal, so you are looking at maybe a three-year, $28 million deal this offseason, or, at the max, a four-year, $38 million deal.

With the Braves paying him $10 million a year, that still leaves the Braves with plenty of money. Even Liberty Media can be happy with that (the cheapskates!).

 

So, give props to Frank Wren on a good trade for a good player. I can’t wait to see Derrek Lee in Braves garb. I want to see Lee, Rick Ankiel, Glaus, Chipper Jones, and Eric O’Flaherty back next year, along with Brooks Conrad, Martin Prado, Omar Infante, Brent Clevlen, and David Ross. We have a good thing going with all these young guys who perform well and get paid decently, but not exorbitantly.

Good job, Frank Wren, and welcome to the club, D-Lee!

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com

O’s deal Rangers fourth straight loss (AP)

August 19th, 2010
Brian Matusz did his homework before facing the Texas Rangers, a team he struggled against throughout his brief major league career. The study session produced the desired results. Matusz allowed five hits over eight innings, and the Baltimore Orioles used a four-run seventh to defeat Colby Lewis and the skidding Rangers 4-0 on Thursday night.

Derrek Lee and the Chicago Cubs Top 10 Adopted Sons of All Time

August 19th, 2010

Late last month, in Cooperstown, New York, Andre Dawson was inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame as a Montreal Expo. This was much to Andre's chagrin, as he'd hoped to go into the Hall of Fame as a Chicago Cub.

You see, Andre spent 11 of his 21 seasons playing for the Expos. He won the Rookie of the Year for the team in 1977, and won six of his eight Gold Gloves in Montreal. Most of his best years and his career stats were accumulated in Montreal.

Nevertheless, as Andre told us on that beautiful day last month, it was the Chicago Cubs fans who reminded him why he loved to play the game of baseball. Andre said that playing in front of the Cubs fans was an experience he'd never forget, and that the people of Chicago truly reminded him that, as Andre said it best, "if you love this game, it will love you back."

Derrek Lee is no longer a Chicago Cubs today; the newest former Cubs star has been traded to the Atlanta Braves for what Cubs fans hope will be the Cubs stars of tomorrow.

In the ironies of ironies, the Braves will be playing at the Cubs this weekend. You can bet that when Lee steps to the plate, he will be showered with the adoration that Cubs fans heap upon their adopted sons, the players who didn't necessarily get their start in Chicago but who showed the Cubs a good time, and to whom the Cubs are forever grateful.

Here's a look at the top ten adopted sons (i.e., players who didn't start their career in Chicago) in Chicago Cubs history.

Begin Slideshow